Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:7303-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4478 of 2024 Petitioner :- A.S. P.V.C. N. Jadunath Singh Jan Kalyan Seva Sanshthan Thru. President Kunwar Munish Singh Parihar Respondent :- Govt. Of India Thru. Sec. Ministry Of Labour And Employment , New Delhi And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Srivastava,Sanjay Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C.,Saurabh Misra,Uday Veer Singh Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. This writ petition is similar to writ petition bearing Writ C No.786 of 2025 (National Competitive And Training Institute Thru. Manager Virendra Kumar Tripathi vs. Govt. of India Thru. Ministry Labour and Employment New Delhi and 5 Others) wherein we have heard learned Counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel for Union of India and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and learned Counsel for the respondent No.6 and passed the following order:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Shri Raj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Union of India and Shri Uday Veer Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 6. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the opposite parties no. 4 and 6 says that out of 24 months work done by the petitioner payment has been given to it for 14 months work. For remaining 10 months work funds have not been received from the concerned Ministry of Govt. of India. Learned counsel for the Union of India does not have any instructions. The District Magistrate, Barabanki has written to the opposite party no. 1 regarding the payment which according to the petitioner includes the payments of the petitioner. Let the opposite party no. 1 take a decision in the matter at the earliest, say, within a period of two months and communicate it to the District Magistrate, Barabanki. If the funds are to be released with approval for payment and the same is granted, then, the payment shall be made to the persons to whom it is due and if it is due to the petitioner, then, paid to the petitioner also unless there is any legal impediment in which case the petitioner shall be informed in writing. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Shri Raj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the Union of India shall communicate this order to the opposite party no. 1 for compliance." 2. Shri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents does not dispute that the matter is similar to writ petition bearing Writ C No.786 of 2025 as asserted by learned counsel for the petitioner, the aforesaid order shall apply in the present petition also on same terms. 3. The writ petition is disposed of. [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 5.2.2025 -Piyush- Digitally signed by :- PIYUSH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench