RAM KISHOR DIXIT AND 28 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/5220/2025 · 2025-05-12
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139519 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139519 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5220 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Kishor Dixit And 28 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Edu. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimal Kishor Singh,Premkant Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Net Ram Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri V.K. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Daya Shankar Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite party nos. 1 and 2 and Sri Net Ram, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 3 and 4. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed the following relief:-
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS thereby commanding and directing the Opposite Party No. 3 and 4 for providing the payment of gratuity to the petitioners. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of MANDAMUS directing the opposite party No. 3 and 4 to decide the representations of the petitioners contained as Annexure No. 02 to this writ petition."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3, i.e., District Basic Sikhsha Adhikari, Kheri, U.P. and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 5.
Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3, i.e., District Basic Sikhsha Adhikari, Kheri, U.P. ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same
strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 12.5.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench