Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13951 (GAU)

ARJUN CHANDRA KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS.

WP(C)/3781/2018 · 2025-01-19

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010124232018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3781/2018 ARJUN CHANDRA KUMAR S/O LT. KANTI RAM KUMAR R/O GOTANAGAR, GUWAHATI - 33, P.S. JALUKBARI DIST. KAMRUP (METRO). VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI -7 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 3:THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE COMMISSIONERATE GUWAHATI CITY PANBAZAR GUWAHATI -1 DIST. KAMRUP (M) Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 4:SRI UJJAL PRATIM BHUYAN ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (ADMN) GUWAHATI ASSAM 5:OFFICER-IN-CHARGE PANBAZAR POLICE STATION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI -01 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 6:SRI HOMENDRA HIRA SUB-INSPECTOR OF PANBAZAR POLICE STATION PANBAZAR GUWAHATI -01. DIST.KAMRUP (M) ASSAM 7:MAHANANDA KUMAR S/O LT. SANTI RAM KUMAR R/O GOTANAGAR GUWAHATI -33 P.S. JALUKBARI DIST. KAMRUP (METRO) 8:SRI AKON DAS S/O LT. UPEN DAS R/O GOTANAGAR GUWAHATI -33 P.S. JALUKBARI DIST. KAMRUP (METRO) 9:SRI DHRUBA CHANDRA DAS S/O HAROHAN DAS R/O SADILAPUR GUWAHATI-11 PS. JALUKBARI DIST.KAMRUP (METRO). Page No.# 3/3 10:SRI SHANKAR KUMAR DAS S/O PRASANNA KUMAR DAS R/O SUNDARBORI P.S. JALUKBARI GUWAHATI -11 DIST. KAMRUP (METRO) Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A K DAS, MR. P MAHANTA,MR. M J GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. J K DAS (R7-R10),MR. A GANGULY (R7- R10),MR T CHHETRI (R7-R10) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 20-01-2025 Mr. M.J. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the State respondents is present. In view of the submission that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous, the writ petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant