Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1395 (AP)

Katragadda Rama Krishna v. S. Suresh Kumar, IAS

CC/3036/2025 · 2026-04-16

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010544482025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3036 of 2025 Between: 1. KATRAGADDA RAMA KRISHNA, , S/O VIJAYA SHANKAR RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 8- 32-73, KATRAGADDA VARI STREET, ISUKAPALLI REPALLE, BAPATLA DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. S SURESH KUMAR IAS, , S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC- PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC- PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS AT VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. DHYANA CHANDRA IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC- CORPORATION,COMISSIOINER, VIJAYAWADA NTR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL 4. G SAMRAJYAM, W/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC- EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-ILL, VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VIJAYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI 2. KOTHARU VIJAYESWARI The Court made the following Order: This Contempt Case is filed under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the Respondents/ Contemnors for Contempt of Court for willful and deliberate disobedience in not complying the orders passed by this Court dated 05.02.2025 in W.P.No.2086 of 2025. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions would submit that the orders passed by this Court have been complied with by the Respondents and requested to close the Contempt Case. Recording the submissions made, the Contempt Case is closed. The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V. SUJATHA Date: 17.04.2026 KK