Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 139482 (ALL)

SUDHANSHU RASTOGI v. SANJAY JAIN AND 3 OTHERS

CMRA/59/2025 · 2025-05-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27274 Court No. - 6 Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 59 of 2025 Applicant :- Sudhanshu Rastogi Opposite Party :- Sanjay Jain And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pritish Kumar,Amal Rastogi Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The present review application has been filed on the ground that the judgement and order, sought to be reviewed, did not consider the Full Bench judgement of this Court in the case of Seth Munna Lal Vs. Seth Jai Prakas AIR 1970 All 257 and the judgement of the Supreme Court in the case of Prem Kishore Vs. Bramh Prakash AIR Online 2023 SC 237. 3. Considering the fact that a judgement cannot be reviewed on the ground that the judgement could not be produced when the matter was heard. 4. The review application cannot be entertained, and is, accordingly, dismissed. Order Date :- 9.5.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench