LOVE SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/4053/2025 · 2025-06-03
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139479 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139479 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34396-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4053 of 2025 Petitioner :- Love Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishal Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Mohd. Ghayasuddin Khan Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State-respondent and Mohd. Ghayasuddin Khan, learned counsel for the opposite party No.4. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the FIR as Case Crime No. 215 of 2024, under sections 447, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Chinhat, District Lucknow. 3. This Court vide order dated 20.05.2025 directed the parties to appear before the senior registrar for verification of the compromise entered into between the parties on 27.05.2025. 4. In compliance of the aforesaid order, the parties appeared before the senior registrar on 27.05.2025 to verify the aforesaid compromise and after verification of contents of the compromise and the parties thereof, the senior registrar has submitted his report dated 27.05.2025. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party No.4 has also submitted that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled through compromise. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the issue in question, particularly, the fact that the present petitioner and the private opposite party have settled their dispute through compromise, which has been verified by the senior registrar, therefore, compelling the prosecution to prosecute the present petitioner would to be a futile exercise and in view of the dictum of Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in re: B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and Another; 2003 (4) SCC 675, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303;
State of Rajasthan vs. Shambhu Kewat, (2014) 4 SCC 149; State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Deepak (2014) 10 SCC 285; State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Manish (2015) 8 SCC 307; J.Ramesh Kamath vs. Mohana Kurup (2016) 12 SCC 179; State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Rajveer Singh (2016) 12 SCC 471; Parbatbhai Aahir vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641, the impugned FIR is hereby quashed. The compromise taken place between the parties and its verification report dated 27.05.2025 submitted by the senior registrar would be the part of this order. 7. The petition is, therefore, allowed. 8.
No order as to costs. . (R.M.N. Mishra, J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.) Order Date :- 3.6.2025 Dhirendra/ Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench