[2025:RJ-JP:23936] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4882/2025 1. M/s Insecticides India Limited, E-442-443 M Riico Industrial Area Chopanki, Post Bhiwadi District Alwar (Raj.) Through Manager 2. M/s Insecticides India Limited Head Office, 401-402 Luso Tower Azadpur Commercial Complex Delhi-110033 Through Managing Director. ----Petitioners/non-claimants Versus Vinod Singh S/o Shi Vijendra Singh Chauhan, R/o Village Kulaana Tehsil And District Jhajjhar (Haryana) ----Respondent/Claimant Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5139/2025 Manager, Daikin Airconditioning India Pvt. Ltd., Industrial Zone, Japanese Zone, Majara Kath, Industrial Zone, Neemrana, District- Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner/non-claimant Versus Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Mahavir Bhambhi, Age 34 Years, R/o Village Post Banya, Tehsil Taranagar, District Churu, Rajasthan ----Respondent/Claimant S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5140/2025 Manager, Daikin Air Conditioning Private Ltd. Ricco Industrial Area Region, Majra Kath Neemrana District Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner/non-claimant Versus Anil Kumar S/o Shri Ved Prakash, R/o Village Salwan, Tehsil Asandh, District- Alwar, Rajasthan ----Respondent/Claimant For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pranjal Mundhra for Mr. Veyankatesh Garg For Respondent(s) : [2025:RJ-JP:23936] (2 of 2) [CW-4882/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 01/07/2025 These writ petitions are filed seeking a direction to quash the proceedings pending before the learned Industrial Tribunal & Labour Court, Alwar (for brevity “the learned Labour Court”) in LCR Nos.03/2021: Vinod Singh versus M/s Insecticides India Limited & Anr., 107/2018: Ramesh Kumar versus Manager, Daikin Airconditioning India Pvt. Ltd. & 47/2017: Anil Kumar versus Manager, Daikin Air Conditioning India Pvt. Ltd. respectively. Indisputably, the objections raised by the petitioners in this regard before the learned Labour Court are pending consideration and in view thereof, this Court does not deem it just and proper to preempt the consideration by the learned Labour Court. Confronted with the aforesaid situation, learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw these writ petitions with a liberty to make a request to the learned Labour Court to decide its objections raised as to maintainability of the claim petitions before proceeding further in the matter. Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed with liberty as aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. It goes without saying that if any such request is made/application is filed, the learned Labour Court is expected to decide it expeditiously in accordance with the law. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/s-213-215