SUBRATA BANIK v. ANKSHUL GUPTA MANAGING DIRECTOR CSTC AND ANR
CPAN/403/2025 · 2025-06-17
Ravi Krishan Kapur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13945 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13945 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
01(ML) 17.06.2025 kaushik
CPAN 403 of 2025 in WPA 12429 of 2023
Subrata Banik Vs. Anshul Gupta & Anr.
Mr. Amal Kumar Sen Mr. Sabyasachi Mondal … for the alleged contemnor.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner nor is any adjournment prayed for on his behalf. CSTC is represented and submits that pursuant to earlier order passed by this Court, the entire payment of Rs.16,14,607/- has been transferred in favour of the writ petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner is directed against alleged violation of an order dated October 5, 2024. In view of the submission made on behalf of the concerned respondent CSTC that the entire amount of Rs.16,14,607/- has been paid to the petitioner post filing of this application, nothing survives in the application. CPAN 403 of 2025 in WPA 12429 of 2023 stands disposed of in view of the above submissions made on behalf of CSTC.
2
A letter dated 19th May, 2025 issued by CSTC authority be kept with the record.
(Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)