UPENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY. SECONDARY EDUCATION U.P. and OTHERS
WRIC/1002711/2015 · 2025-09-08
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139447 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139447 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 1002711 of 2015 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present petition has lost its efficacy by efflux of time, therefore, the same may be dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
2. This petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having rendered infructuous. September 8, 2025 Haseen U. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Upendra Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. Secondary Education U.P. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- HASEENUDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench