VISHWANATH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF SUGAR INDUSTRIES LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/5159/2025 · 2025-05-09
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139434 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27442
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5159 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vishwanath Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Sugar Industries Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anand Kumar,Prince Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Brijendra Singh,Indu Prakash Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Heard Sri Anand Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Parmanand Asthana, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1, Sri Brijendra Singh, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the opposite party no. 2 and Sri Indu Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3. By means of this petition the petitioner has prayed following relief :
"I. Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to make payment of arrear encashment Rs. 18276/- and Provident fund along of salary Rs.81275/-, Leave with prevalent rate of interest to the petitioner till it is actually paid to him, within stipulated period by this Hon'ble court in compliance of the orders as fixed passed in earlier writ petitions as well as in contempt petition of the petitioner. II. Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to pay damages to the petitioner for mental agony and financial crises which he has suffered due to delay in clearing the retirel dues of the petitioner."
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that ends of justice would suffice if he is allowed to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3 and the same may be directed to dispose it of with speaking and reasoned order within stipulated time. With the consent of parties the writ petition is disposed of finally at the admission stage. Without entering into the merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within 15 days before the opposite party no. 3 i.e. Pradhan Prabandhak, Kishan Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd., Sultanpur (Avadh) taking all his pleas and grounds and enclosing his earlier representations along with all relevant documents. If such a representation is moved the
opposite party concerned is directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner with speaking and reasoned
order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, strictly in accordance with law expeditiously, say within a period of two months from the date of production of the certified copy of this order. The decision on the representation shall be communicated to the petitioner forthwith. Writ petition is finally disposed of. . [Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.]
Order Date :- 9.5.2025 Om Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench