Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 139371 (ALL)

VIRENDRA KUMAR SAHU @ VIRENDRA SURESH GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

A483/393/2025 · 2025-05-14

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28096 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 393 of 2025 Applicant :- Virendra Kumar Sahu @ Virendra Suresh Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mangal Sen Yadav,Deepansi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 483 Cr.P.C./529 BNSS has been filed by the applicant with the following main reliefs: "Wherefore, it is most humble prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the learned Additional Session Judge ADJ 1st Sultanpur to expedite the Trial of Case No.- 461/2013 (State Vs. Gopal Yadav and others) arising out of Case Crime No.- 428/2013, Under Sections-302, 201/34 I.P.C., Police Station- Piparpur, District- Amethi as early as possible within stipulated time framed, in the interest of justice." 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he has lodged an FIR on 13.6.2013 under Section 302, 201/34 IPC against the named accused persons i.e. respondent nos. 2 to 4. The charge-sheet was filed and trial was committed in the year 2013 but more than 12 years have been passed and the case is still at the stage of evidence. 4. It is further submitted that the court concerned used to allow the exemption application preferred by the accused persons. 5. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has confined his prayer to the extent that a direction may be issued to the court concerned to decide the matter within stipulated time as the court may fix. 6. Learned AGA has no objection with the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant. 7. Accordingly, the application under Section 483 Cr.P.C./529 BNSS is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned to decide the aforesaid case, as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties and if any adjournment is necessary, only short dates may be fixed, provided there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 14.5.2025 AKK Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench