Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13933 (MAD)

ARUMUGAM v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/2340/2025 · 2025-01-31

P T Asha

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.2340 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 31.01.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA W.P.No. 2340 of 2025 Arumugam ...Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector Room no.1, First Floor, Collectorate, Salem 636001. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office Compound, Tiruchengode road, Sangagiri, Sangagiri taluk, Salem district 637301. 3.The Tahsildar, Edappadi, Edappadi taluk, Salem district 637101 ...Respondents 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2340 of 2025 Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned order issued by the 3rd respondent herein in file no. 2024/0103/08/502365 dated 05.11.2024, quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to issue patta in the name of the petitioner in respect of the property comprising in survey No. 159/4c measuring 0.68 cents (0.27.50 hect), situated at Avaniperur Keelmugam Village, Edappadi Taluk, Salem District. For Petitioner : Mr. S.Mayilnathan For Respondents : Mr. P.Sathish Additional Government Pleader. O R D E R The Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: “To call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned order issued by the 3rd respondent herein in 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2340 of 2025 file no. 2024/0103/08/502365 dated 05.11.2024, quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to issue patta in the name of the petitioner in respect of the property comprising in survey No. 159/4c measuring 0.68 cents (0.27.50 hect), situated at Avaniperur Keelmugam Village, Edappadi Taluk, Salem District.” 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that the 3rd respective has passed a non speaking one line order, without considering the case of the petitioner. 3. Heard the learned counsels on the either side and perused the records. 4. The impugned order would read as follows: “bjhlu;g[ gj;jpuk; - K:yg;gj;jpu efy; rku;g;gpf;ftpy;iy@” 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2340 of 2025 5. A mere perusal of the impugned order would clearly shows that the order passed by the 3rd respondent is a non speaking one line order. 6. Therefore, the impugned order is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the file of the 3rd respondent, for a fresh consideration. The petitioner shall re-submit the documents back to the 3rd respondent and the 3rd respondent shall acknowledge the same. Thereafter, within a period of 2 months, the 3rd respondent shall consider and pass a speaking order. 7. The Writ Petition is allowed. No costs. 31.01.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No kan 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2340 of 2025 To 1.The District Collector Room no.1, First Floor, Collectorate, Salem 636001. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office Compound, Tiruchengode road, Sangagiri, Sangagiri taluk, Salem district 637301. 3.The Tahsildar, Edappadi, Edappadi taluk, Salem district 637101 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.2340 of 2025 P.T. ASHA, J, kan W.P.No. 2340 of 2025 31.01.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis