Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12598 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1158 of 2021 Applicant :- Omkar Singh Opposite Party :- Om Prakash Verma Executive Director U.P. Govt.Employees Welf Counsel for Applicant :- Satendra Nath Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- Rahul Shukla,Mahendra Pratap Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Sri Anuj Kumar Pandey, Finance and Accounts OfÏcer, U.P. Government Employees Welfare Corporation, Lucknow who is respondent in the present contempt application is present and has submitted that he is Chief Finance OfÏcer, Vidhan Sabha and he was given the additional charge of the post of Finance and Accounts OfÏcer, U.P. Government Employees Welfare Corporation, Lucknow in the year 2022 and subsequently he was also given the ofÏciating charge of Executive Director, U.P. Government Employees Welfare Corporation, Lucknow but in February, 2025, the charge of Executive Director has been taken as new incumbent has joined on 19.02.2025 as Executive Director but he is still having the ofÏciating charge of Finance and Accounts OfÏcer, U.P. Government Employees Welfare Corporation, Lucknow. Learned counsel for respondent has submitted that the compliance afÏdavit filed in CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 766 of 2022 (In re: Smt. Usha Agarwal vs. Om Prakash Verma, Executive Director, U.P. Govt. Empolyees Welfare Corporation Lko. And Others) shall be read in the present contempt application also. Learned counsel for the respondent has submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ Court has been complied with whereby it has been directed for payment of admitted post retiral dues to the applicant which has been paid and the same can be seen from the chart enclosed at page no. 10 of the compliance afÏdavit at Srl. No. 8 in which the name of the applicant has been mentioned. Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ Court has been complied with but there is some dispute regarding payment of post retiral dues paid to the applicant but for all practical purposes, the contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous but liberty may be given if he is still aggrieved about the amount, he may avail the remedy, as may be permissible under the law for redressal of the said grievance. In view of above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous with a liberty to avail the remedy about the amount as may be permissible under the law. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench