RAMADHAR (DECEASED) THRU. VARISH OMKAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPTT. LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
A227/2716/2025 · 2025-05-08
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139297 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139297 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26972 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2716 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramadhar (Deceased) Thru. Varish Omkar And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Principal Secretary, Revenue Deptt. Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State/opposite party Nos.1 and 2 and perused the record. By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks following main relief :-
"(i) To issue an order or direction the opposite party No.2 for decided / disposal pending suit No. 0592/2018 Computer Suit No. T-201810640200592 Ramadhar Vs. State U/s 144 U.P. Revenue Code 2006 Gata No. 199 Area 1-620 hect. Revenue Village Bijwar Khurd, Pargana Khairabad, Tehsil- Sadar Sitapur District- Sitapur Just and proper in the interest of justice. (ii) To issue an order or direction the opposite parties are not dispossession / disturbance / in peaceful possession and not change of land nature during the pendency in this suit No. 0592/2018 the before opposite No.2 just and proper in the interest of justice." It is stated that as per para 458 (1) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, case in issue should preferably be decided within a period of one year. However, in the instant case, the case is pending since 2018 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioners are suffering great hardship. In these circumstances, indulgence of this Court is required in the matter. The prayer is to expedite the proceedings of pending case. Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite
order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite party No.2 to decide the suit No.0592/2018 Computer Suit No. T- 201810640200592 (Ramadhar Vs. State) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of one year from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 8.5.2025/ML Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench