Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13928 (AP)

C VENKATA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/8860/2025 · 2025-04-04

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8860 OF 2025 Between: C Venkata Reddy, S/o. Late Narayana Reddy Age 50 years, Founder Family Seetha Ramanjaneya Swamyvari Devasthanam Gundemadakala Village, Vinjamuru Mandal SPSR Nellore District. Member of Sri ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravati Guntur District. 2. The Director General of Police, Mangalagiri, Guntur District. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Nellore District. 4. The Circle inspector, Kaligiri, SPSR Nellore District 5. The Station House Officer, Vinjamur Police Station, Vinjamur, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh. SPSR ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action the respondents 2 to 5 in not providing the police assistance to the petitioner for conducting Sri Seetharama Swamyvari Kalyanam and Brahmostavams to be conducted from 06.04.2025 to 12.04.2025 in Sri Seetha Ramanjaneya Swamyvari Devasthanam, Gundemadakala Village, Vinjamuru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, by considering the petitioner representation 22.03.2025 as bad, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 21, 25 and more of 26 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2 to 5 respondents take action for providing police assistance to petitioner for conducting the Sri Se§tharama Swamyvari Kalyanam and Brahmostavams to to be conducted Jrom 06.04.2025 to 12.04.2025 in the Subject temple performed by the :^^itioner. fcisj©: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents no. 2 to 5 to consider the petitioner representations dated 22.03.2025 for providing police protection the Petitioner for performing Sri Seetharama Swamyvari Kalyanam Brahmostavams to be conducted from 06.04.2025 to Seetha Ramanjaneya Swamyvari Devasthanam, Gundemadakala Vinjamuru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District. Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 1 to 5: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following ORDER: to and 12.04.2025 in Sri Village, 1 HN, J W.P.No.8860 2025 APHC010170032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8860/2025 Between: C Venkata Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.D VSASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME 2 HN, J W.P.No.8860 2025 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is seeking police protection (bandobust) for performing the Sri Seetharama Swamyvari Kalyanam Brahmostavams in Sri Seetha Ramanjaneya Swamyvari Devasthanam, Gundemadakala Village, Vinjamuru Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, which is proposed to be held from 06.04.2025 to 12.04.2025. regard, the petitioner also submitted a representation dated 22.03.2025. In this 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner belongs to the founder family of the temple and is managing the affairs of the temple. In this regard, he has filed W.P.No.9231 of 2024 seeking the police protection, which was disposed off on 24.04.2024. granted to the petitioner. Police protection was 3. This Court disposed off the Writ Petition after recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader that police protection had been provided for conducting Sri Rama Navami Kalyanam and rituals, and no further orders were required in this Writ Petition. 4. Today, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the police are providing protection (bandobust) for the peaceful performance of the Brahmothsavams and that they will extend the police protection (bandobust) from 06.04.2025 to 12.04.2025. necessary 3 HN, J W.P.No.8860 2025 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a seauel. oendina miscellaneous petitions, if any, ^all stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGJSTRAR //TRUE COPY// N OFFICER SE To, 1. One CC to SRI. D V SASIDHAR, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies 2. 3. PRK HIGH COURT DATED:04/04/2025 ORDER WP.Nb.8860 of 2025 5 07 AM 2025 Current Section 1 CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS