Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13927 (RAJ)

ABHINAV JAIN S/O SUNIL KUMAR JAIN v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARK

CW/6264/2025 · 2025-07-07

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6264/2025 Abhinav Jain S/o Sunil Kumar Jain, Aged About 35 Years, 148,krishi Mandi Ke Piche, Brajlal Naga, Malpura, Tonk (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus The Registrar Of Trade Mark, Government Of India, Near Chanakyapuri Overbridge, Ghatlodia, Ahmedabad, Gujarat. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.D. Bansal For Respondent(s) : Ms. Nandini Chaturvedi for Mr. Prashant Chaturvedi JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 07/07/2025 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that an application seeking registration of trade mark has been submitted by the petitioner before the Registrar, Trademark on 24.11.2022. Counsel submits that in-spite of passing of considerable time, till date, the said application is still lying pending for its adjudication on merits and the same has not been decided by the authority by passing a reasoned speaking order. Counsel submits that appropriate directions be issued to the authority concerned to decide the said application expeditiously within a time frame. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection, if such direction is issued. (2 of 2) [CW-6264/2025] 3. Considering the arguments put forward by the learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the limited prayer made by him, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by issuing directions to the Registrar, Trademark to decide the application (pending, if any) expeditiously, as early as possible, preferably within a period three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all concerned. 4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order/direction to the Registrar, Trademark to decide the application of the petitioner in a particular way. He would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/54