BHURAMAL UJJANIYA v. RAJ STATE MINES AND MINERALS LTD
CW/3702/2008 · 2025-08-14
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13926 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13926 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31943] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3702/2008 Bhuramal Ujjaniya S/o Shri B.R. Ujjaniya, aged about 52 years, Working as Manager (F & A), Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd., Sadul Club, SBU & PC (Gypsum), Bikaner. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd., through its Chairman, C-89-90, Lal Kothi, Jaipur.
2. The Managing Director, Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd., Corporate Office, 4-Meera Marg, Udaipur.
3. The Chief (Personnel & Administration) Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd., Corporate Office, 4-Meera Marg, Udaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankul Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Bhodiwal, Mr. Yug Singh & Mr. Aditya Sharma on behalf of Mr. R.B. Mathur, Sr. Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 14/08/2025
1. By way of filing this petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction against the respondents for extending promotion on the post of Manager (Finance) from the date on which person junior to him was given promotion i.e. with effect from 12.04.2002 along with all consequential benefits.
2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier ignoring his seniority one Mr. M.L. Koolwal promoted on the post of Manager (Finance) however, when the petitioner raised his grievances, aforesaid Mr. M.L. Koolwal was also reverted
[2025:RJ-JP:31943] (2 of 2) [CW-3702/2008] from the Post of Manager (Finance) to the post of Deputy Manager. Later on, the petitioner was promoted on the post of Manager (Finance) vide order dated 20.10.2007 with effect from
30.12.2006.
3. It has been admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no person junior to him was promoted earlier to him on the post of Manager (Finance) and there was no rule or regulation prevailing in the respondent-Corporation for conferring automatic promotion on acquiring eligibility for promotion.
4. In view of above, no right of consideration of the petitioner was prejudiced, therefore, no interference is called for in the instant writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed.
(ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /18