HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Anticipatory Bail Application No. 69 of 2025 Arshad ..….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Faizan Ali, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Akshay Latwal, Brief Holder for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) The applicant seeks anticipatory bail in FIR/Case Crime No.1285 of 2024, dated 12.12.2024, under Sections 3/5/11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that the co-accused Yakub and Abdul Rehman having similar role had already been enlarged on anticipatory bail. 4. This fact is admitted by the learned State counsel. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is a case, in which, the applicant should be granted anticipatory bail. The instant anticipatory bail application deserves to be allowed. 2 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. 7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicant shall be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“the AO”) concerned. In addition to it, the applicant shall also comply with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever. (ii) He shall cooperate with the investigation. (iii) The applicant shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. (iv) The applicant shall deposit his passport with the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. If the applicant does not have passport, he shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. (v) The applicant shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 10.02.2025 Sanjay