Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 139193 (ALL)

MOHD. ARSHAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. OF U.P. LOK BHAWAN LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

/3985/2025 · 2025-08-06

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:46713 Court No. - 28 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 3985 of 2025 Applicant :- Mohd. Arshad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Of U.P. Lok Bhawan Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Akil Imam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Satish Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. 1. Heard Sri Akil Imam, learned counsel for applicants as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the chargesheet No. 01 of 2023 and the summoning order dated 12.09.2023 in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 362/2022 under Sections 406, 420, 506, I.P.C., P.S. Gudamba, District Lucknow, pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (IInd), Lucknow, on the basis of compromise. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that in compliance of the order dated 12.05.2025 passed by this Court the applicant filed compromise deed before the court of learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Room No. 26, Lucknow, and the concerned court vide its order dated 20.05.2025 verified the said compromise in the presence of the applicant and opposite party no.3, copy of which is annexed as Annexure- 2 to the supplementary-affidavit filed by the petitioner. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate has submitted that since the parties have entered into compromise, which has also been verified by the trial court, therefore, no useful purpose would be served if the proceedings of the aforesaid case go on further. 5. Sri Mehnaz Hasmi, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Satish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 3, is also present. He has no objection to the statement, made above. In view of the above, it is deemed proper and meet the ends of justice that the proceeding of the aforementioned case be quashed. 6. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application stands allowed, keeping in view the statement/compromise made by the applicant as well as opposite party no.3. The entire proceedings of chargesheet No. 01 of 2023 and the summoning order dated 12.09.2023 in F.I.R./Case Crime No. 362/2022 under Sections 406, 420, 506, I.P.C., P.S. Gudamba, District Lucknow, pending in the court of Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate (IInd), Lucknow, as also the entire proceeding of the said case is hereby quashed. 7. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad or certified copy issued from the Registry of the High Court, Allahabad. 8. The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing. (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 6.8.2025 A.Nigam Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench