COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT NANAK CHAND JANTA INTER COLLEGE SAUNDA GHAZIABAD AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/4185/2025 · 2025-02-13
Saral Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13919 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13919 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20715 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4185 of 2025 Petitioner :- Committee Of Management Nanak Chand Janta Inter College Saunda Ghaziabad And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bajrang Bahadur Singh,Satya Prakash Singh,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjay Yadav Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
1. Heard Sri Ashok Khare, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri S.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and G.K. Singh, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Sanjay Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has prayed for the following relief:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 13.12.2024 passed by respondent no.3. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to grant approval to the election of petitioner Committee of Management held on 15/16.09.2024. (iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the present case. (iv) Award the cost of the writ petition to the petitioner."
3. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the no opportunity of hearing was afforded to the petitioner before passing the impugned order, and as such, the impugned order is not sustainable in law. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents also could not demonstrate from the impugned order that any opportunity of hearing was afforded to the petitioner before passing the impugned order. 5. In such view of the fact, considering the aforesaid submission advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and without going into the merits of the case, the writ petition is being disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no.2-Regional Level Committee, Meerut Region, Meerut along with a certified copy of this order raising all its grievances against the impugned order within a period of two weeks from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.2 shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of two months thereafter after giving due notice and opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties.
Order Date :- 13.2.2025 NS Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad