PRANSHI @ DIPANSHI THRU. HER NATURAL GUARDIAN HUSBAND PRATEEK CHAURASIA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 3 OTHERS
HABC/160/2025 · 2025-05-08
Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139184 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139184 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 11 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 160 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pranshi @ Dipanshi Thru. Her Natural Guardian Husband Prateek Chaurasia Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Shankar Tiwari,Saakshi Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Heard Ms. Saakshi Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.P. Tiwari, learned A.G.A. This habeas corpus petition has been filed alleging that the detenue, who is wife of the deponent is in unlawful custody of the respondent nos. 4, who is the father of the detenue. It is apparent, as per pleadings in the petition and from the documents annexed with the petition and as admitted by the deponent in his application to the Station Officer, Vikas Nagar, District Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh and the Police Commissioner, Commissionerate Lucknow, the deponent has received a notice under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act. In view of above, it appears that there is some dispute between the parties because she has filed a petition under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act, therefore, she can not be said to be in unlawful custody. With the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 8.5.2025 Raj Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench