RAM PRATAP TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLY LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/4459/2025 · 2025-05-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139138 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139138 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28145 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4459 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Pratap Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Food And Civil Supply Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Janardan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
Order on Amendment Application An application has been filed by the applicant seeking amendment in the name of respondent no. 6, which has been wrongly mentioned. The application is allowed. Let necessary amendment be carried out during the course of the day. Office is directed to number the amendment application.
Order Date :- 14.5.2025 Arun
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4459 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Pratap Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Food And Civil Supply Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Janardan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking conclusion of the enquiry initiated against the respondent no. 6.
3. The petitioner is only a card-holder and no rights of his have been shown to be violated for which a mandamus is sought.
4. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to seek portability of his card to another shop of his choice. In case, such an application is filed before the opposite party no. 3, he shall permit the portability of the petitioner to another shop.
Order Date :- 14.5.2025/Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench