MOHD. AKRAM AND ORS. v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE/FAST TRACK COURT RAIBARELI and ORS.
WRIA/1000036/2015 · 2025-05-02
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139137 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139137 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25612
Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1000036 of 2015 Petitioner :- Mohd. Akram And Ors. Respondent :- Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court Raibareli And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd.Aslam Khan,B.R. Singh,Mohammad Ehtesham Khan Counsel for Respondent :- U.N.Misra,Bireshwar Nath,Brijesh Kumar Saxena,Raj Kumar Bajpai Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard Shri M.E.Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri D.C. Jain, learned counsel for respondent no.3.
2. Present petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging the order dated 27.09.2012 passed by the prescribed authority in exercise of power under Section 21(1)(a) of U.P. Act No.13 of 1972 as well as the order dated 25.02.2015 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioners as dismissed.
3. Perusal of the two orders indicate that the premises in question was directed to be released after evaluating the bonafide need and comparing the hardship in between the parties. The trial Court considered the need set up for establishing the business of workshop of repair etc.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not point out any apparent illegality or infirmity in the findings recorded by both the Courts warranting interference under Art. 226 of Constitution of India.
5. Considering the finding of fact recorded after considering the evidence on record, no interference is warranted, as such, present petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 2.5.2025 nishant Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench