1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. C.R No. 5 of 20 16 Decided on: 09.05.2025 Ramesh Kashyap ......Petitioner Versus Sudershna ...Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Vipinder Roach, Advocate. For the respondent: None. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, submits that the matter has become infructuous as the possession has already been handed over to the respondent- landlord. 2. Resultantly, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. May 09 , 2025 ( G.S. Sandhawalia ) (ankit) Chief Justice 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?