Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27290 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2733 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hausila Prasad Mishra Respondent :- Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jagdish Pratap Pandey,Durgesh Vijay Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State/opposite party No.1 as well as Shri Mohan Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the Gaon Sabha/opposite party No.16 and perused the record. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondents is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks following main relief :- "Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to direct the opposite party No.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya to expeditiously decide the impleadment application dated 29.11.2024 filed by the petitioner in Revision No.980 of 2024 (Computerized No.C202404000000980) under Section 210 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending in the Court of opposite party No.1, according to law within time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. It is further prayed that the Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to direct the opposite party No.1 to decide the Revision No.980 of 2024 (Computerized No.C 202404000000980) under Section 210 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, pending in the Court of opposite party No.1, in accordance with law within time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court." It is stated that as per para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, an appeal or revision as the case may be itself should preferably be decided within a period of six months. However, in the instant case, the impleadment application is pending since 29.11.2024 in the pending revision and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner is suffering great hardship. In these circumstances, indulgence of this Court is required in the matter. The prayer is to expedite the proceedings of pending case. Learned State counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose will be served in keeping this petition pending. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite party No.1/Additional Commissioner, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to consider and decide the application for impleadment dated 29.11.2024 within a period of two months and conclude the proceedings of the Revision No.980 of 2024 (Computerized No.C202404000000980) most expeditiously after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either party preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 9.5.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench