Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13907 (UTT)

DEEPAK BAMRARA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3708/2024 · 2025-02-11

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:700 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 11th FEBRUARY, 2025 WRIT PETITION NO. 3708 of 2024 (M/S) Deepak Bamrara ..…Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others ..…Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Navnish Negi, Advocate through video conferencing. Counsel for the State/ : Mr. Suyash Pant, respondent nos.1 to 3 Standing Counsel. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India with the following prayers:- “(i) Issue writ, order, or direction in the nature of Certiorari Quashing the Impugned Order dated 17/12/2024 passed by the District Magistrate, Pauri Garhwal Annexed as Annexure no. 1 to the Writ Petition. (ii) Issue any other direction or order as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case. (iii) Award costs of the writ petition to the petitioner.” 2025:UHC:700 2 2. Heard Mr. Navnish Negi, learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing and Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. Mr. Suyash Pant, Advocate, submitted on instruction that the impugned order has been recalled by the District Magistrate, Pauri Garhwal. 4. After the said submission, Mr. Navnish Negi, Advocate, has submitted that the present writ petition has become infructuous. 5. The present writ petition (WPMS No.3708 of 2024) is dismissed as infructuous. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Date: 11.02.2025 Pant/