Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13907 (KAR)

M/S RADIAL INDIA PVT LTD v. THE GENERAL SECRETARY

WP/5044/2019 · 2025-01-06

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:69 WP No. 5044 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 5044 OF 2019 (L-RES) BETWEEN: M/S RADIAL INDIA PVT. LTD. #25 (D), IIND PHASE PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA BANGALORE - 560 058 REP. BY MR MANOJ KUMAR CHANDRAN …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KRISHNA R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE GENERAL SECRETARY ENGINEERING & GENERAL WORKERS UNION GHATE BHAWAN, GAYATHRI DEVI PARK EXTN. VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE - 560 003 2. THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENTS (STANDING ORDERS) ACT & ADDIITONAL LABOUR COMMISSIONER (ADMIN) GOVT. OF KARNATAKA KARMIKA BHAVANA BANGALORE - 560 029 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI RAO, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE R-2 DATED 28.12.2018 (ANNEXURE-M) PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE MAIN PETITION AND ETC. Digitally signed by PRAMILA G V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:69 WP No. 5044 of 2019 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER The Registry had noticed 11 office objections in the petition. On 27.06.2019, the Registrar of this Court had granted ten days time to comply the office objections. Office objections were not complied. On 12.12.2019, two weeks time was gratned to comply the office objections with a rider that the petition would be dismissed in case office objections are not complied. Since office objections are not complied, the petition was dismissed. 2. Later two applications are filed i.e., I.A.Nos.1/2021 and 2/2021 to recall the order and condone the delay in filing the application. Those applications were not in order. The Registry raised office objections on those applications. On 11.07.2023, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. On 08.01.2024, a week's time was granted to rectify the office objections. On 28.02.2024, it is submitted by the petitioner that the office objections on applications are complied. On - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:69 WP No. 5044 of 2019 20.03.2024, the case was listed for orders on I.A.Nos.1/2021 and 2/2021 and both the applications were allowed and order dismissing the petition for non-prosecution was recalled. Thereafter, the case was listed on 12.08.2024 and the matter was adjourned by two weeks to remove office objections on the main petition. Sofar the office objections are not removed. 3. Though the petition is called for the second time, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The petition is of the year 2019. No reasons to adjourn the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4