HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CPSW No. 68/2016 In SWP No. 3416/2014 Farooq Ahmed Choudhary …..Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs Rohit Kansal & Anr. .….Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (20.12.2025) 01. By virtue of an order dated 09.12.2014, writ petition SWP No. 3416/2014 came to be disposed of without adjudication on merits but with a direction to the writ respondent No. 1 to accord consideration to the petitioner’s representation already submitted. 02. The institution of this contempt petition came to take place on 23.02.2016 i.e. after a period of more than one year from date of passing of order dated 09.12.2014. 03. During the pendency of this contempt petition though in a state of dormancy, the petitioner has not come forward with any application to register grievance that consideration to his case has not been accorded, as such, this Court is well within its judgment to Serial No. 12 Supplementary List-I 2 CPSW No. 68/2016 In SWP No. 3416/2014 draw an inference that the compliance of the writ court direction has been carried out, as such, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous and, is accordingly, dismissed. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 20.12.2025 Shivalee