Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13902 (GAU)

RANJIT SOREN AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

WP(C)/3323/2024 · 2025-01-26

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010124162024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3323/2024 RANJIT SOREN AND ANR S/O- LATE DINESH SOREN, RESIDENT OF VILL- BASHBARI, P.O. AND P.S.- GOSSAIGAON, DIST.- KOKRAJHAR, BTC, ASSAM, PIN- 783360. 2: MANIK SOREN S/O- LATE MAHENDRA SOREN RESIDENT OF VILL- BASHBARI P.O. AND P.S.- GOSSAIGAON DIST.- KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN- 783360 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE (REFORMS) AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE (REFROMS) AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KOKRAJHAR Page No.# 2/3 P.O. AND DIST.- KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN- 783360. 4:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BTC KOKRAJHAR ASSAM P.O. AND DIST.- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN- 783360. 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER GOSSAIGAON REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. AND DIST.- KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN- 783360. 6:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL) GOSSAIGAON P.O. AND DIST.- KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN- 783360 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KHAN, MS J AKTAR Advocate for the Respondent : SC, REVENUE, SC, BTC,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 27-01-2025 Heard Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. N. Bordoloi, learned standing counsel, Health Department for the respondent. Page No.# 3/3 By filing this petition, the petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondent authorities to dispose of the prayer petition dated 06.01.2023 for restoration of the ceiling surplus land. During the pendency of the writ petition, the Joint Secretary, Bodoland Territorial Council, Kokrajhar vide order dated 30.08.2024 has rejected the prayer of the petitioner. In view of the above, the writ petition stands closed with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order dated 30.08.2024, if so advised. Interim order, if any, passed earlier stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant