Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7694 WP No. 2353 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 2353 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. G B SHIVAKUMAR S/O G A SAI BABA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/A MANIKANTHA NILAYA NEAR SURABHI KALYANA MANAPA 15TH WARD, BHARATHI NAGAR HOSPETE TALUK VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT 583201 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATHISHA D J., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR AHANA SOUHARDA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD 3RD FLOOR, MINI V V TOWER PODIUM BLOCK, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU 560 001
REP BY ITS COMPETENT AUTHORITY SRI SUDARSHAN B K ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7694 WP No. 2353 of 2025
2.
AHANA SOUHARDA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD HOSPET, VIJAYANAGAR DISTIRCT REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN SRI SATHISH S M S/O S M KOTRABASAIAH 5TH WARD, BEHIND VIVEKANANDA SCHOOL RANI PETE, HOSPITE 583201 REG. U/S 5 OF THE KARNATAKA SAUHRADA SAHAKARI ACT 1997.
3. NASEEMUNNISA W/O ASLAM M AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS R/A NO. 12TH WARD, BANGAR STREET I S R ROAD, CHITTAWADGI, HOSPTE VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT 583201 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VEERESH R BUDIHAL., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER IN MISC. PETITION NO. 397/2024 DATED 15/10/2024 PASSED BY THE XC1 ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR KPIDFE CASES BANGALORE AT ANNX-J. AND GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER TO STAY THE IMPUGNED ORDER IN MISC. PETITION NO. 397/2024 DATED 15/10/2024 PASSED BY THE XC1 ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR KPIDFE CASES BANGALORE AT ANNX-J AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7694 WP No. 2353 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 20.02.2025 seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and file an appeal in terms of Section 16 of the Karnataka Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 2004.
2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed while reserving liberty to the petitioner as prayed for. If an appeal is filed, the time spent by the petitioner before this Court in this writ petition shall be taken into
consideration.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
JT/- CT: JL