HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 3508/2025 CM No. 7989/2025 Mani Ram …..Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd. Latief Malik, Advocate Vs UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondents Through: CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (17.12.2025) 1. The subject matter of the writ petition can be safely agitated by the petitioner in a civil suit which in the facts and circumstances of the case would be the most efficacious remedy at the disposal of the petitioner rather than resorting to writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India which jurisdiction may not enable this Court to figure out the dispute of demarcation of land of the petitioner in khasra No. 43 min vis-à-vis khasra No. 44 by reference to which the construction from the end of the official respondents is intended to take place which is reckoned by the petitioner to be actually taking place at the site of khasra No. 43 min Serial No. 183 Supplementary List-1 2 WP(C) No. 3580/2025 situated at village Pashwalian, tehsil and district Samba, as such, the petitioner is allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a civil suit following due course of law. 2. Dismissed as withdrawn. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 17.12.2025 SUNIL Whether the order is speaking ? : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable ? : Yes/No