Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 2025:HHC:20306 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMP(M) 772 of 2025 a/w Review Petition No. 47 of 2025 Date of decision: 27.06.2025 ________________________________________________________ Union of India & others …..Petitioners Versus Thakur Dass …Respondent ________________________________________________________
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________________ For the Petitioners: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India (Senior Advocate), with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. G.S. Sandhawalia
, Chief Justice
(Oral)
Order dated 03.10.2024, passed in CWP No. 3158 of 2016, titled as Thakur Dass Vs. Union of India & others, is sought to be reviewed by the present application. 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
2. The Review Application is barred by 190 days.
3. Perusal of the aforesaid order would go on to show that it was dictated in the open Court in the presence of the Counsel for both the parties.
3. Learned Deputy Solicitor General of India brought to our notice that in similar circumstances, Review Petition No. 40 of 2025, titled Union of India & others Vs. Joginder Lal, was dismissed by this Court on 25.06.2025, while noticing that there was no error apparent on the face of the record. It is submitted that the situation is similar as such.
4. Resultantly, keeping in view the above, we are of the considered opinion that neither the application for condonation of delay is liable to be allowed nor there is any merit to review the order dated 03.10.2024, passed in CWP No. 3158 of 2016
3
5. Accordingly,
the
application
for condonation of delay in filing the Review Petition is dismissed. Consequently, the Review Petition is also dismissed.
(G.S. Sandhawalia)
Chief Justice. June 27, 2025
(Satyen Vaidya) (hemlata)
Judge.