BHARTIYA MAHAVIDYALAYA RUNNING v. MR RAVI NATH RAMAN
CLCON/598/2025 · 2026-01-08
Ravindra Maithani
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 139 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS D/62
CLCON No.598 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vijay Bhatt, Advocate for respondent no.1. Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, Brief Holder for the State. The petitioner has brought to the notice of the Court that the order dated 08.08.2025, passed in WPMS No.2295 of 2025, has been wilfully disobeyed by the respondents. Today, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 submits that, in fact, the
order has already been complied with and an
order has been issued yesterday. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned counsel for the respondent no.1. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the respondent no.1, nothing survives in the instant contempt petition. It stands disposed of accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 08.01.2026 Sanjay