CRM-M- IN 137+290 Ajay Bansa Vers State of Pun CORAM: Present: AARADHN CRM-4422 of Bank sta subject to a CRM-M- 1. under Sect against him petition for 2. been falsely -38159-2024 -1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA CHANDIGA Bansal Versus Punjab AM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE AA Mr. Sumit Gupta, Advocate fo Mr. Hardeep Hans, Assistant A Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate Ms. Reetika Sabharwal, Advoc **** ADHNA SAWHNEY, J. (Oral) 44222-2025 This is an application for plac nk statement (Annexure P-8). Application is allowed and th ct to all just exceptions. -38159-2024 Petitioner, an accused in case r Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 o st him at Police Station Sarabha Naga ion for grant of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel for the petit falsely implicated in the present case 1- PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT DIGARH CRM-44222-2025 IN/AND CRM-M-38159-2024 Date of Decision: 13.11.2025 …Petitioner. …Respondent. CE AARADHNA SAWHNEY. cate for the petitioner. stant Advocate General, Punjab. vocate and Advocate for the complainant. or placing on record synopsis and cop and the documents are taken on recor in case FIR No.0006 dated 29.1.202 , 506 of Indian Penal Code, registere a Nagar, Ludhiana, has filed the prese e petitioner submits that petitioner ha t case and no direct or indirect role ha .2025 nd copy n record .1.2024, gistered present ner has role has GURBACHAN SINGH 2025.11.18 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- been attribu with the co the wife of not been n case. As p submission account in been effec settlement, wife of B anticipatory 3. learned cou the attentio Gurdev Sin the status re FIR, it has the said fir 33275-202 instance of Night Trad petitioner. Singh on c petitioner u and to ma Bhagatpree -38159-2024 -2 attributed to him. Further, he (P) has the complainant as he was having busi ife of Bhagat Preet Singh. Precisely f een nominated in the present FIR no As per learned counsel, the dispute ission of learned counsel that petition unt in Delhi, against Bhagat Preet Sing effected and the entire dispute ha ment, petitioner has made payment of Bhagat Preet Singh. Learned ipatory bail granted to petitioner be co Per Contra, while opposing ed counsel for complainant as also le ttention of this Court to the status re ev Singh, PPS, Assistant Commission tatus report, apart from reiterating the as mentioned that petitioner is ow id firm in connivance with Bhagat 2024) had purchased material fro e of petitioner, the material was als Trading and Mohan Mart Pvt. L ner. Further, petitioner was sellin on commission basis. During the c ner undertook to pay Rs.1.50 crore b make calculations of remaining tpreet Singh, but he did not pay the s 2- P) has no concern/business transaction g business transactions with the firm o isely for the said reason, petitioner IR nor he was required in the prese ispute is purely of civil nature. It is th etitioner had filed a suit for rendition o et Singh etc. in which a compromise ha ute has been resolved. As per th ment of Rs.90,00,000/- to the firm o rned counsel prays that the interi be confirmed. posing the petition for grant of bai also learned State counsel have draw atus report filed by way of affidavit o issioner of Police (West), Ludhiana. I g the facts leading to the lodging of th s owner of Shree Krishna & Sons an gat Preet Singh (petitioner in CRM l from Bhagat Preet Singh. At th s also supplied to other firms, i.e., K vt. Ltd., whose owner is friend selling the material of Bhagat Pre the course of joining of investigatio ore by 8.3.2024 on behalf of his firm ing amount of Rs.2.50 crores wi the said amount to the complainant. sactions firm of has present It is the ition of ise has per the firm of interim of bail, e drawn davit of iana. In g of the ns and CRM- At the .e., K- nd of Preet ation, firms s with ant. GURBACHAN SINGH 2025.11.18 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M- connivance crores and for custodia of the petiti 4. documents 5. anticipatory Court vide 6. petitioner a the order da dated 7.8.2 Section 482 as and whe be served b tamper with the country 7. 13.11.2025 gbs -38159-2024 -3 Learned counsel for the comp ivance with his co-accused has com and has also forged bank statement. ustodial interrogation to recover the s e petition was made. Heard learned counsel for th ments on record. While issuing notice of motio ipatory bail in the same terms as passe t vide order dated 7.8.2024. In view of the submissions m ioner and the fact that petitioner has rder dated 7.8.2024 passed by this Cou 7.8.2024 is hereby confirmed, subjec on 482(2) of BNSS. Further, petition when required in future by way of w rved by Investigating Officer of this er with the evidence nor will influenc ountry without prior permission of the Petition stands allowed. .2025 Whether Speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable 3- complainant contends that petitioner s committed a huge fraud of Rs.7.1 ement. Presence of petitioner is neede r the said amount. Prayer for dismiss for the parties and have perused th motion, petitioner was granted interi s passed in CRM-M-33275-2024 by th ions made by learned counsel for th joined investigation consequent is Court, interim bail granted vide ord subject to conditions as envisaged und etitioner is directed to join investigatio ay of written notice for such purpose f this case upon petitioner, he will n fluence the witnesses and will not leav of the Court. (AARADHNA SAWHNEY) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No tioner in Rs.7.18 needed ismissal sed the interim by this for the quent to de order d under tigation rpose to will not ot leave NEY) GURBACHAN SINGH 2025.11.18 17:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document