Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138969 (ALL)

MEENA KUMARI v. DIRECTOR BAL VIKAS SEVA EVAM PUSHTAHAR VIBHAG U.P. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/5071/2025 · 2025-05-07

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26688 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5071 of 2025 Petitioner :- Meena Kumari Respondent :- Director Bal Vikas Seva Evam Pushtahar Vibhag U.P. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Surya Kumar,Pushpendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel for respondent nos. 1 to 4. Notice to respondent no. 5 is dispensed with in view of the proposed order. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh representation raising his grievances to respondent no. 3, with a direction to decide the same within a stipulated period. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. Considering the above, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation before respondent no. 3 within two weeks from today and in case, such a representation is submitted, the same shall be decided by respondent no. 3 within a further period of four weeks by passing a reasoned and speaking order. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.5.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench