N THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8918 OF 2025 Between: Velugureddy Dinesh, S/o.Boya Thimmappa, Age 21 Years, Occ: Daily Cooly, 1/276 Eddulapalli (V),Pamidi (M), Ananthapuram Dist.(He is the son of CT Prisoner No.6117 in Central Prison Kadapa. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Principal Secretary (Home),AP Secretariat, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Ananathapuram Dist, 3. The Superintendent of Central Prison, Kadapa, YSR Dist. 4. The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Guntakal,YSR Dist. 5. The Inspector of Police Pamidi, Ananthapuram Dist. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2^^ to 5‘^ respondents not recommending for release on perole of the CT Prisoner No.6117, Boya Thimmappa who has been in Central Prison \Kadapa since 2013 for attending his son's marriage/petitioner to be held on 10.04.2025 without assigning any reasons as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional, violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Articles 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of the Bharat and contrary to the procedure contemplated under the provisions of Jail manual. i w lA NO: 1 OF 2025 4 vV? w^^■p^tition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances d i4 ^he affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court ^ pifeased to direct the respondents to release the Concivt Prisoner 51 T7rbf Kadap Central Prisoner, Namely Boya Thimmappa on perole to attend the petitioner /son marriage to beheld on 10.04.2025 for 4 weeks pending disposal of the above writ petition. fc-.-'. s <'■ * t ! ■4 Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI GUNDALA SIVA PRASADA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010169942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8918/2025 Between: Velugureddy Dinesh ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.GUNDALA SIVA PRASADA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is seeking parole for his father to attend the petitioner’s marriage which is scheduled on 10.04.2025. The petitioner’s father is undergoing life imprisonment in Sessions Case No.277 of 2013. A copy of the wedding card IS also filed along with this writ petition. It is submitted that the parole sought in this writ petition is for a period of four weeks. ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 3. On 04.04.2025, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader requested time to get instructions. 4. Today, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that the petitioner has not submitted any representation seeking parole earlier and after receipt of this writ petition, the 5*" respondent has visited the village at Eddulapalli and caused enquiry. During the enquiry, it came to know that the convicted person has a daughter by name Tanusha, aged 21 years and one son Dinesh Kumar, aged 19 years. It was also revealed that there was no marriage proposal made to the petitioner and that he has also not reached the right age for marriage. It is also stated in the written instructions that the convicts family members have planned to set parole to the convict prisoner. The marriage invitation card is created for the purpose of this writ petition. 5. Considering the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, this Court is of the considered opinion that parole cannot be granted to the petitioner’s father in such circumstances. The ground of marriage of the petitioner is set up in seeking parole. Such instances ought to be discouraged. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. 7. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall Sd/- N NAGAMMA //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR stand closed. OFFICER S To, 1. One CC to Sri Gundala Siva Prasada Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 3. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr K HIGH COURT DATED:07/04/2025 ORDER g 0 8 APR 2025 3*1 ^ * Current Section WP.No.8918 Of 2025 DISMISSING THEW.P. WITHOUT COSTS