1 2025:CGHC:15216-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1130 of 2025 Dr. Bharat Bhushan Bode S/o Saryukant Bode Aged About 67 Years R/o Plot No. 127, Indira Awas Sah Vyavasayik Parisar, Ward No. 09, Korba, Tahsil and District Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Home Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Superintendent of Police Jashpur District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Station House OfÏcer Police Station Jashpur, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh. 4. Chandra Kumar S/o Kashi Ram Kolta Aged About 37 Years R/o Mahamaya Medical, Kansabel, Ps Kansabel, District Jashpur, Chhattisgarh ...Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Rajkamal Singh & Suryapratap Yuddhveer Singh, Advocates. For Respondents/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2025.04.02 10:36:56 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 01.04.2025 1. Heard Mr. Rajkamal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing along with Mr. Suryapratap Yuddhveer Singh, learned counsel. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondents No. 1 to 3/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers: “1. This Hon’ble Court may please be kind enough in quashing and setting aside the entire prosecution including the First Information Report, charge-sheet and also the order dated 18.02.2025 passed by the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jashpur, Chhattisgarh in the Criminal Case No. 1558 of 2024 (Annexure P/1 & Annexure P/2), in the interest of justice. 2. This Hon’ble Court may please be kind enough in granting any other relief.” 3. On perusal of the prayer in the present petition, it transpires that the present petition is drafted with the prayer which is defective one, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a 3 vague and sketchy prayer as there is no mention of the offences and date under/on which the FIR has been registered. Further, there is also no mention of the date on which the charge-sheet was submitted before the trial Court and the offences, to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file afresh petition with proper prayer. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs. 2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court and submit a receipt of the same at the time of filing of the fresh petition, if any, and the amount so deposited, if any, shall be transmitted to the Government Special School for Visual & Hearing Impaired, Bilaspur. 6. Certified copy of the FIR, charge-sheet and other documents may be returned back to the petitioner after retaining a photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Brijmohan