A.Ravanammal and 9 others v. Tmt.P.Amudha IAS AND 2 OTHERS
CONT P/772/2024 · 2025-07-22
P T Asha, R Subramanian
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13893 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13893 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Contempt Petition No.772 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22.07.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA Contempt Petition No.772 of 2024
1. A.Ravanammal
2. Parameswari
3. S.Rathinammal
4. A.Yesammal
5. P.Chinnammal
6. J.Fathima
7. A.Sathya
8. K.Chellamal
9. S.Ramalammal
10. V.Angammal ... Petitioners Versus
1. Tmt. P. Amudha, IAS The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort. St. George, Chennai 600 009.
2. Thiru.Shankar Jiwal, IPS The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Contempt Petition No.772 of 2024
3. Sandeep Rai Rathore IPS, The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.
... Respondents PRAYER: The Contempt Petitions filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for having committed Civil Contempt for willful disobedience of the order of this Court in WA No.480 of 2015 pronounced on 14.06.2019. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Prakash, Senior Counsel for Mr.S.Karupasamy
For Respondents : Mr.P.Kumaresan, AAG Asst. by Mr.P.Ananda Kumar, GA O R D E R (Order of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) The orders of this Court, contempt of which is complained of,
directed regularisation of the workers in a particular scale of pay and also
directed monetary benefits to be given with effect from 01.10.2017. The 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Contempt Petition No.772 of 2024 Government has now issued a Government Order in G.O.(3D). No.75 dated 21.08.2024 conferring the benefits on the employees.
2. It is the grievance of Mr.V.Prakash, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner that some of the petitioners have been retired on attaining the age of 58, though they are entitled to continue in service till 60. We leave that question open to be agitated by the petitioners, if they are so aggrieved. As of now, the orders of the Division Bench directing payment of a particular pay scale to all the petitioners have been complied with.
3. Mr.P.Kumaresan, learned Additional Advocate General would assure the Court that those of the petitioners, who are still working will retire only at the age of 60.
4. Hence the Contempt Petition is closed.
(R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.) (P.T.ASHA, J.)
22.07.2025 jv 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Contempt Petition No.772 of 2024 Internet: Yes Index: Yes/No Speaking order/Non Speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No To
1. Tmt. P. Amudha, IAS The Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort. St. George, Chennai 600 009.
2. Thiru.Shankar Jiwal, IPS The Director General of Police, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004.
3. Sandeep Rai Rathore IPS, The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Vepery, Chennai 600 007. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Contempt Petition No.772 of 2024 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and P.T.ASHA, J. jv Contempt Petition No. 772 of 2024 22.07.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis