Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13892 (UTT)

FIROZ ALI KHAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/2493/2024 · 2025-06-05

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D1- 54 WPSS No.2493 of 2024 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Ankit Bisht, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the writ petition has rendered infructuous because the impugned suspension order has been revoked. In view of what is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 05.06.2025 RV