Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 4343 of 2025 Apasari Pradhan ..... Petitioner Mr. G.K. Nanda, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. M.K. Dash, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 14.02.2025 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the above circumstances, it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the Writ Petition; a) And a writ of mandamus or an appropriate Writ be issued directing the Opposite Parties especially to the O.P. No. 1 & 2 to regularize their service with effect from 04.09.2012 (i.e. from the date when she was conferred Temporary Status ) with all consequential service benefits. b) And be pleased to pass such other order/orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper for granting complete and effective justice to the petitioner; c) And for this act of kindness, the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.” Page 2 of 2. 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha