Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 13892 (BOM)

Humera Begum Mohammed Kashif and ors v. Union of India

CA/4192/2025 · 2025-04-15

Shri S G Chapalgaonkar

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} 25 sr.no..odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4192 OF 2025 IN FAST/3372/2025 HUMERA BEGUM MOHAMMED KASHIF AND ORS ….Applicant VERSUS UNION OF INDIA …..Respondent ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Syed Moisali Amjedali Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Ramdas Bhaurao Bhosale For R/sole CORAM : S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. DATE : 15th APRIL, 2025. ORDER :- ON C.A. NO. 1267 OF 2025 Heard Mr. Bhosale, learned advocate for applicant. 2. Applicant seeks to condone delay of 62 days caused in filing the appeal. 3. Perused application. It is clear that the delay has occasioned on account of administrative exigencies. Hence, sufficient cause is made out. 4. In the result, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) and disposed of. ON APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL/CA 4192 OF 2025 Since the amount is not deposited, the application does not survive and disposed of as such. [S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.] grt/-