Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138906 (PNJ)

SAREETI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

CWP/5263/2025 · 2025-03-07

Meenakshi I Mehta, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-5263-2025 107 IN THE SAREETI STATE OF HA CORAM: HO HO Present: M M for M for SANJEEV PR 1. The pres 11.06.20 Economi advertise 2. Although Haryana the socio bonus m ultra vire conducte was decl 025 (O&M) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH Vs. F HARYANA AND ORS. **** HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJ HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEE **** Mr. Shivdeep Bali, Advocate with Mr. Ajay Ghangas, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Chauhan, Advocate for respondent No.3/UHBVN. **** V PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) e present petition has been preferred a .06.2019 alleging that the bonus mark onomic criteria ought not have vertisement. though in CWP No.1563 of 2024 titled yana and others, decided on 31.05 socio economic criteria laid down by nus marks awarded for socio econom ra vires, we find that the present cas nducted under the notification dated 1 s declared on 15.03.2021, and the ch NJAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CWP-5263-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.03.2025 . . . . Petitioner . . . . Respondents SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA e with ral) erred assailing the notification dated s marks as awarded under the Socio have been applied to the said titled as Sukriti Malik Vs. State of 1.05.2024, this Court has quashed wn by the State of Haryana and the onomic criteria have been held to be ent case relates to earlier selections ated 11.06.2019 for which the result the challenge to the said result and M) 2025 ioner s ated ocio said of shed d the to be tions esult t and MOHIT GOYAL 2025.03.10 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-5263-2025 appointm long time 3. Present accordin 4. All pend 07.03.2025 Mohit goyal 1. Whether 2. Whether 025 (O&M) pointments made thereto has not been g time. esent petition suffers from gross lac cordingly dismissed. l pending applications also stand dispo (SANJE (ME ther speaking/reasoned? Ye ther reportable? Ye t been made by the petitioner for a ss laches and delay. The same is disposed of. ANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No for a e is MOHIT GOYAL 2025.03.10 13:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document