Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:22016-DB
Page 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3183 of 2025
----- Charlis Soren, aged about 65 years, Son of Late Rengta Anthony Soren, Resident of Village- Ramnathpur, Post Office- Malpahari, Police Station- Malpahari (O.P.), District- Pakur, Jharkhand
… … … Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur, Post Office and Police Station- Pakur, District- Pakur, Jharkhand.
3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Pakur, Post Office and Police Station- Pakur, District- Pakur, Jharkhand
4. The Circle Officer Pakur, Post Office and Police Station- Pakur, District- Pakur, Jharkhand.
5. The District Mining Officer, Pakur, Post Office and Police Station- Pakur, District- Pakur, Jharkhand.
6. Charan Kisku, Son of Late Dhanai Kisku, Resident of village- Ramnathpur, Post Office- Pakur, Police Station-Pakur Malpahari (O.P), District- Pakur, Jharkhand.
7. Ganjel Kisku, Son of Late Dhanai Kisku, Resident of village- Ramnathpur, Post Office- Pakur, Police Station-Pakur Malpahari (O.P), District- Pakur, Jharkhand.
8. Hopan Babu Kisku, Son of Late Dhenai Kisku, Resident of Village – Ramnathput, Post Office- Pakur, Police Station- Pakur Malpahari (O.P.), District- Pakur, Jharkhand
9. M/s C.B. Stone Company represented through Proprietor Jitu Bellani Son of Late Parshuram Bellani, Resident of Mohalla- Sindhipara, Pakur, Post Office- Pakur, Police Station-Pakur(T), District-Pakur, Jharkhand. … … … Respondents
-------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI ------- For the Petitioner
:Mrs. Nitu Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents
:Mrs. Sunita Kumari, A.C. to Sr. S.C.-II
------
Order No.04/Dated 06thAugust, 2025
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the writ-petitioner submits that, in view of the fact that a declaratory suit has already been instituted seeking declaration of right and title over the land in question, she may be allowed to withdraw the present writ
2025:JHHC:22016-DB
Page 2
petition in order to avail the remedy available under the Code of Civil Procedure for seeking appropriate injunction in the pending suit.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the said prayer.
3. Considering the aforesaid submission, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy available under the statute.
4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, and as such, stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
(Arun Kumar Rai, J.)
Umesh/Abhishek