APHC010169632013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25990/2013 Between: 1. SMT.C.PARVATHI, W/O. C.VIRUPAKSHI REDDY AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/O. 11/1, BEHIND AMBABHAVANI TEMPI, LINGAMMA COMPOUND, TALUR ROAD, BELIARY- KARNATAKA STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, HAVING REGD. OFFICE, AT BHARAT BHAVAN, 4&6, CURRIMBHOY ROAD, BALLARD ESTATE, P.B. NO. 688, MUMBAL- 400001 2. THE STATE COORDINATOR, BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED, RELIANCE HUMSAFAR, II FLOOR, 8-2- 618/2,ROAD NO. 11, BANJARA HILLS, HYDERABAD -500034. 3. PALAKSHA REDDY BANDRALREDDYS/O BASAVARAJ BRANDRALREDDY, H.NO.R-2-246C, OBULAPURAM VG., D.HIREHAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DIST. R3 IS IMPLEADED AS PER C.O. DT. 20-1-14 IN WPMP 40996 OF 13 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in 2 cancelling petitioner’s empanelment for establishing Retail Outlet of Petrol Pump at D, Hirehal on SH-19 near Karnataka border, Anantapur district, by the proceedings dated 12-08-2013 as illegal arbitrary and contrary to the rules of allotment, and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petiotner along with other applicants without reference to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 12-08-2013, and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 32111 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to finalize the allotment of Retail Outlet at D Hirehal in SH-19 near Karnataka border till the disposal of the Writ Petition in this Hon’ble Court and pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP 40996 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioner as Respondents in W.P.M.P. No.32111/2013 as well as in W.P.No.25990/ 2013 and pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the interest of justice. Hyderabad IA NO: 5 OF 2013(WPMP 145901 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SITA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O MANOHER REDDY 2. K NARSI REDDY The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Niranjan, learned counsel representing Sri K.Sita Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous. 3 Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Date: 27.06.2025 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25990/2013 Date: 27.06.2025 KA