Sumit Kumar v. Additional Commissiner (Judicial) Ayodhya Division Ayodhyaa and others
A227/2621/2025 · 2025-05-06
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138878 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138878 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26275 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 2621 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sumit Kumar Respondent :- Additional Commissiner (Judicial) Ayodhya Division Ayodhyaa And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar,Chandra Prakash,Ram Lakhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Rajendra Prasad Maurya, learned Standing Counsel for the State/opposite party No.1 and perused the record. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private- respondents is hereby dispensed with. By means of this petition, the petitioner seeks following main relief(s) :-
"i-ममानननीय न्यमायमालय ससे पमाररनमा हहै ककि ऐसमा आदसेश / कनदरश पमाररित किरिनसे किकी किक पमा किकी जमावसे ककि, वमाद ससं० 88/2020, किम्ययटरिनीकिक त वमाद ससं० सनी202004000000088 (ररिततुरिमाज सससंह व अन्य बनमाम सतुकमत कितु ममारि आकद) अपरि आयतुक्त न्यमाकयकि अययोध्यमा मण्डल अययोध्यमा कियो त्वररित कनस्तमारिण सम्बन्धनी आदसेश पमाररित किरिनसे किकी किक पमा किकी जमावसे सजसससे ककि कनधमारररित समय अवसध किसे भनीतरि कनस्तमाररित हयो सकिसे हहै।" Taking note of Rule 183(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016 made under U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and para 458(2) of U.P. Revenue Court Manual, as per which, revision or appeal should preferably be decided within six months, however, in the instant case, the revision is pending since 2020 and on account of pendency of the same, the petitioner, as stated, is suffering great hardship and mental agony, this petition is
disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.1/Addl. Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Mandal, Ayodhya to consider and decide the Case No.88/2020 (Computerized Case No.C-202004000000088) (Rituraj Singh and others Vs. Sumit Kumar and others), expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties to the litigation and without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, preferably within a period of six months from the next date fixed in the case, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 6.5.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench