Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.1439 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Piyush Sammal, Advocate, through video conferencing and Ms. Sarita Bisht, Advocate for the petitioner.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State.
3. Ms. Babita Jalal, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, Advocate for respondent no.3, who claims that the Vakalatnama has been filed on his behalf.
4.
Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous, as charge sheet has been submitted in the matter on 18.03.2025, which is not disputed by
learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition.
6. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous with a liberty to the petitioner to challenge the charge sheet before appropriate forum.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
26.03.2025 SK