U.P.S.I.D.C. v. ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE AGRA AND ANOTHER
FAPL/177/1999 · 2025-05-18
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13885 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 13885 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:83159
Court No. - 36 Case :- FIRST APPEAL No. - 177 of 1999 Appellant :- U.P.S.I.D.C. Respondent :- Addl. District Judge Agra And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Satya Prakash Counsel for Respondent :- Madhav Jain Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
1. The matter called out for hearing today. Despite repeated calls, none appeared on behalf of the appellant. There is also no representation on record to indicate any valid ground for non- appearance.
2. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 3.Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default of appearance. 4.All pending applications, if any stand rejected. 5.However, it is made clear that the appellant shall be at liberty to file an application for restoration, if so advised, subject to showing sufficient cause for non-appearance.
5. Pending applications, if any, stands rejected. Order Date :- 19.5.2025/A. Digitally signed by :- AFAQ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad