HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No. 3674 of 2024 (M/S) Pratap Singh Gusain ….......Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand and others …..... Respondents Present : Ms. Harshi Gupta, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Yogesh Pant, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. JUDGMENT Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks directions to the respondent no.2, the District Magistrate, Tehri Garhwal, to decide the application 09.09.2016, filed by the petitioner, which is Annexure No.1 to the petition. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had filed an application for allotment of land for mining on 09.09.2016, to the respondent no.2, The District Magistrate, Tehri Garhwal, but it has yet not been decided. 4. Learned State Counsel would submit that the application has already been decided on 11.06.2018. He 2 would submit that now the mining lease is to be given, as per e-auction. 5. The Court takes on record the statement given by learned State Counsel. 6. Since the application dated 09.09.2016 given by the petitioner has already been decided, and, further, a statement has been given that process for lease of land for mining would be carried out by e-auction, nothing survives in this petition. It stands disposed of at the stage of admission itself. (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 29.04.2025 Ravi Bisht