Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 138832 (ALL)

SUNIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/5069/2025 · 2025-05-07

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:26693 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5069 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishwanath Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Deepshikha, learned Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to submit a fresh representation raising his grievances to respondent no. 2, with a direction to decide the same within a stipulated period. Learned Chief Standing Counsel has no objection to this innocuous prayer. Considering the above, the petitioner is directed to submit a fresh representation before respondent no. 2 within two weeks from today and in case, such a representation is submitted, the same shall be decided by respondent no. 2 within a further period of four weeks by passing a reasoned and speaking order. With these observations, the petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 7.5.2025/R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench