RUKHSAAR BANO AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/3872/2025 · 2025-05-08
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138795 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 138795 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27075-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3872 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rukhsaar Bano And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rama Niwas Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. Petitioners have approached this Court for the following main reliefs:
"(i) a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the opposite party no.1 to 3 not to harass the Petitioners on the behest of opposite party no.4, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the opposite party no.1 to 3 to ensure protection of lives of the petitioner no.1 and the petitioner no.2"
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays to withdraw present writ petition as F.I.R. has been lodged in this matter, with liberty to file a petition, if required, at the appropriate stage.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, present writ petition is consigned to record as withdrawn. . [Brij Raj Singh,J.] [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 8.5.2025 Sachin Digitally signed by :- SACHIN MEHROTRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench